Solomon Islands vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Solomon Islands
1,082 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Africa
1,096 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Solomon Islands rank
106th
South Africa rank
105th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Solomon Islands
  • South Africa
05001.0k1.5k199020052021

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 1,096 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,082 current US$ per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 14 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 31 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Solomon Islands ranks 106th and South Africa ranks 105th of 178 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Solomon Islands South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 333.7 current US$ per square kilometre 1,343 current US$ per square kilometre 1,009 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 443.49 current US$ per square kilometre 1,271 current US$ per square kilometre 827.78 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 879.79 current US$ per square kilometre 1,357 current US$ per square kilometre 477.05 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 1,022 current US$ per square kilometre 1,096 current US$ per square kilometre 73.49 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Solomon Islands or South Africa?
South Africa, at 1,096 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,082 current US$ per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2020.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Solomon Islands and South Africa?
14 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and South Africa?
31 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
How do Solomon Islands and South Africa rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Solomon Islands ranks 106th and South Africa ranks 105th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Solomon Islands vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/solomon-islands/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/solomon-islands/south-africa/">Solomon Islands vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.