Sao Tome and Principe vs Trinidad and Tobago: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Sao Tome and Principe
6,853 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Trinidad and Tobago
7,561 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sao Tome and Principe rank
33rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
31st

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Trinidad and Tobago
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199020052021

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 7,561 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,853 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 708 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 33rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 31st of 178 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
2000s 3,340 current US$ per square kilometre 4,649 current US$ per square kilometre 1,310 current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 5,164 current US$ per square kilometre 6,423 current US$ per square kilometre 1,259 current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 6,579 current US$ per square kilometre 6,962 current US$ per square kilometre 383.15 current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Sao Tome and Principe or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 7,561 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,853 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Sao Tome and Principe and Trinidad and Tobago?
708 current US$ per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Trinidad and Tobago?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 33rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 31st of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Trinidad and Tobago: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/trinidad-and-tobago/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Trinidad and Tobago: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.