Panama vs Turkmenistan: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Panama
634.25 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Turkmenistan
474.71 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2019
Panama rank
129th
Turkmenistan rank
132nd

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Panama
  • Turkmenistan
0200400600199020052021

How they compare

Panama currently reports 634.25 current US$ per square kilometre against 474.71 current US$ per square kilometre in Turkmenistan, a difference of 159.54 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.3 times Turkmenistan's.

Across all 28 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

Panama ranks 129th and Turkmenistan ranks 132nd of 178 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 270.39 current US$ per square kilometre 65.22 current US$ per square kilometre 205.17 current US$ per square kilometre Panama
2000s 340.35 current US$ per square kilometre 116.95 current US$ per square kilometre 223.4 current US$ per square kilometre Panama
2010s 612.61 current US$ per square kilometre 391.51 current US$ per square kilometre 221.1 current US$ per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Panama or Turkmenistan?
Panama, at 634.25 current US$ per square kilometre against 474.71 current US$ per square kilometre in Turkmenistan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Panama and Turkmenistan?
159.54 current US$ per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Turkmenistan?
28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2019.
How do Panama and Turkmenistan rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Panama ranks 129th and Turkmenistan ranks 132nd of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Turkmenistan: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/panama/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/panama/turkmenistan/">Panama vs Turkmenistan: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.