Mauritania vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Mauritania
86.37 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Namibia
108.72 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Mauritania rank
172nd
Namibia rank
171st

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Mauritania
  • Namibia
5075100125150175199020052021

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 108.72 current US$ per square kilometre against 86.37 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 22.35 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Mauritania's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Mauritania ranks 172nd and Namibia ranks 171st of 178 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 70.63 current US$ per square kilometre 95.69 current US$ per square kilometre 25.06 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 67.63 current US$ per square kilometre 111.22 current US$ per square kilometre 43.59 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 84.38 current US$ per square kilometre 139.58 current US$ per square kilometre 55.2 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 81.35 current US$ per square kilometre 106.42 current US$ per square kilometre 25.07 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Mauritania or Namibia?
Namibia, at 108.72 current US$ per square kilometre against 86.37 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Mauritania and Namibia?
22.35 current US$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Namibia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Mauritania and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Mauritania ranks 172nd and Namibia ranks 171st of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/namibia/">Mauritania vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.