Libya vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Libya
115.42 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Namibia
108.72 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Libya rank
170th
Namibia rank
171st

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Libya
  • Namibia
50100150200199020052021

How they compare

Libya currently reports 115.42 current US$ per square kilometre against 108.72 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 6.7 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 170th and Namibia ranks 171st of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 110.04 current US$ per square kilometre 95.69 current US$ per square kilometre 14.34 current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2000s 102.31 current US$ per square kilometre 111.22 current US$ per square kilometre 8.91 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 170.88 current US$ per square kilometre 139.58 current US$ per square kilometre 31.3 current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2020s 141.47 current US$ per square kilometre 106.42 current US$ per square kilometre 35.05 current US$ per square kilometre Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Libya or Namibia?
Libya, at 115.42 current US$ per square kilometre against 108.72 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Libya and Namibia?
6.7 current US$ per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Namibia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Libya and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Libya ranks 170th and Namibia ranks 171st of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/">Libya vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.