Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Latvia
824.7 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zimbabwe
915.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Latvia rank
119th
Zimbabwe rank
116th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Latvia
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k199020052021

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 915.09 current US$ per square kilometre against 824.7 current US$ per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 90.39 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 119th and Zimbabwe ranks 116th of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 430.09 current US$ per square kilometre 262.48 current US$ per square kilometre 167.61 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 746.54 current US$ per square kilometre 269.13 current US$ per square kilometre 477.41 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 714.55 current US$ per square kilometre 808.75 current US$ per square kilometre 94.2 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 720.93 current US$ per square kilometre 915.09 current US$ per square kilometre 194.16 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Latvia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 915.09 current US$ per square kilometre against 824.7 current US$ per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2020.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Latvia and Zimbabwe?
90.39 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Latvia and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Latvia ranks 119th and Zimbabwe ranks 116th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/zimbabwe/">Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.