Kyrgyzstan vs Norway: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Kyrgyzstan
173.51 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Norway
173.21 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
161st
Norway rank
162nd

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Norway
100150200250300199020052021

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 173.51 current US$ per square kilometre against 173.21 current US$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.3 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Norway ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 161st and Norway ranks 162nd of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 164.15 current US$ per square kilometre 221.63 current US$ per square kilometre 57.49 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 114 current US$ per square kilometre 226.83 current US$ per square kilometre 112.83 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 164.1 current US$ per square kilometre 209.64 current US$ per square kilometre 45.54 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 169.16 current US$ per square kilometre 153.63 current US$ per square kilometre 15.54 current US$ per square kilometre Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Kyrgyzstan or Norway?
Kyrgyzstan, at 173.51 current US$ per square kilometre against 173.21 current US$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Kyrgyzstan and Norway?
0.3 current US$ per square kilometre, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Norway?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Norway rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 161st and Norway ranks 162nd of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Norway: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kyrgyz-republic/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kyrgyz-republic/norway/">Kyrgyzstan vs Norway: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.