South Korea vs Malta: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

South Korea
28,264 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Malta
22,214 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Korea rank
4th
Malta rank
7th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • South Korea
  • Malta
10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k30.0k199020052021

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 28,264 current US$ per square kilometre against 22,214 current US$ per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 6,050 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Korea's figure about 1.3 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was South Korea ahead.

South Korea ranks 4th and Malta ranks 7th of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 11,553 current US$ per square kilometre 10,281 current US$ per square kilometre 1,272 current US$ per square kilometre South Korea
2000s 13,108 current US$ per square kilometre 14,496 current US$ per square kilometre 1,388 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 19,465 current US$ per square kilometre 20,817 current US$ per square kilometre 1,351 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 26,735 current US$ per square kilometre 21,727 current US$ per square kilometre 5,008 current US$ per square kilometre South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, South Korea or Malta?
South Korea, at 28,264 current US$ per square kilometre against 22,214 current US$ per square kilometre in Malta as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between South Korea and Malta?
6,050 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Malta?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do South Korea and Malta rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
South Korea ranks 4th and Malta ranks 7th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Korea vs Malta: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/malta/">South Korea vs Malta: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.