Guatemala vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Guatemala
4,717 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sri Lanka
4,514 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Guatemala rank
37th
Sri Lanka rank
38th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Guatemala
  • Sri Lanka
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k199020052021

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 4,717 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,514 current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 203 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 37th and Sri Lanka ranks 38th of 178 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 2,865 current US$ per square kilometre 772.45 current US$ per square kilometre 2,093 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 3,346 current US$ per square kilometre 1,373 current US$ per square kilometre 1,973 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 4,144 current US$ per square kilometre 3,916 current US$ per square kilometre 227.9 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 4,627 current US$ per square kilometre 4,465 current US$ per square kilometre 162.09 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Guatemala or Sri Lanka?
Guatemala, at 4,717 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,514 current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Guatemala and Sri Lanka?
203 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sri Lanka?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Guatemala and Sri Lanka rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Guatemala ranks 37th and Sri Lanka ranks 38th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/sri-lanka/">Guatemala vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.