Finland vs Libya: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Finland
128.68 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Libya
115.42 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Finland rank
167th
Libya rank
170th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Finland
  • Libya
0100200300199020052021

How they compare

Finland currently reports 128.68 current US$ per square kilometre against 115.42 current US$ per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 13.26 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 167th and Libya ranks 170th of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Libya Difference Ahead
1990s 203.92 current US$ per square kilometre 110.04 current US$ per square kilometre 93.88 current US$ per square kilometre Finland
2000s 164.35 current US$ per square kilometre 102.31 current US$ per square kilometre 62.04 current US$ per square kilometre Finland
2010s 129.67 current US$ per square kilometre 170.88 current US$ per square kilometre 41.22 current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2020s 119.84 current US$ per square kilometre 141.47 current US$ per square kilometre 21.62 current US$ per square kilometre Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Finland or Libya?
Finland, at 128.68 current US$ per square kilometre against 115.42 current US$ per square kilometre in Libya as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Finland and Libya?
13.26 current US$ per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Libya?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Finland and Libya rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Finland ranks 167th and Libya ranks 170th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Libya: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/libya/">Finland vs Libya: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.