Finland vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Finland
128.68 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Kazakhstan
122.41 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Finland rank
167th
Kazakhstan rank
169th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Finland
  • Kazakhstan
0100200300199020052021

How they compare

Finland currently reports 128.68 current US$ per square kilometre against 122.41 current US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 6.27 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 167th and Kazakhstan ranks 169th of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 3 and Kazakhstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 175.03 current US$ per square kilometre 68.27 current US$ per square kilometre 106.76 current US$ per square kilometre Finland
2000s 164.35 current US$ per square kilometre 86.53 current US$ per square kilometre 77.82 current US$ per square kilometre Finland
2010s 129.67 current US$ per square kilometre 144.84 current US$ per square kilometre 15.17 current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 119.84 current US$ per square kilometre 115.3 current US$ per square kilometre 4.54 current US$ per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Finland or Kazakhstan?
Finland, at 128.68 current US$ per square kilometre against 122.41 current US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Finland and Kazakhstan?
6.27 current US$ per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Kazakhstan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Finland and Kazakhstan rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Finland ranks 167th and Kazakhstan ranks 169th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/kazakhstan/">Finland vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.