Estonia vs Oman: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Estonia
275.47 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Oman
306.51 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Estonia rank
149th
Oman rank
146th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Estonia
  • Oman
100200300400500199020052021

How they compare

Oman currently reports 306.51 current US$ per square kilometre against 275.47 current US$ per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 31.04 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 149th and Oman ranks 146th of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Oman in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Oman Difference Ahead
1990s 256.92 current US$ per square kilometre 147.22 current US$ per square kilometre 109.71 current US$ per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 343.14 current US$ per square kilometre 234.19 current US$ per square kilometre 108.96 current US$ per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 266.68 current US$ per square kilometre 387.62 current US$ per square kilometre 120.94 current US$ per square kilometre Oman
2020s 256.68 current US$ per square kilometre 290.06 current US$ per square kilometre 33.38 current US$ per square kilometre Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Estonia or Oman?
Oman, at 306.51 current US$ per square kilometre against 275.47 current US$ per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Estonia and Oman?
31.04 current US$ per square kilometre, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Oman?
27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
How do Estonia and Oman rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Estonia ranks 149th and Oman ranks 146th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Oman: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/estonia/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/estonia/oman/">Estonia vs Oman: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.