Ecuador vs Montenegro: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Ecuador
1,274 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Montenegro
1,328 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Ecuador rank
98th
Montenegro rank
96th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Montenegro
2505007501.0k1.2k199020052021

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 1,328 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,274 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 54 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.

Ecuador ranks 98th and Montenegro ranks 96th of 178 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 735.06 current US$ per square kilometre 1,018 current US$ per square kilometre 282.58 current US$ per square kilometre Montenegro
2010s 1,194 current US$ per square kilometre 1,061 current US$ per square kilometre 132.65 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 1,256 current US$ per square kilometre 1,279 current US$ per square kilometre 23.19 current US$ per square kilometre Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Ecuador or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 1,328 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,274 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Ecuador and Montenegro?
54 current US$ per square kilometre, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Montenegro?
16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
How do Ecuador and Montenegro rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Ecuador ranks 98th and Montenegro ranks 96th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Montenegro: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/montenegro/">Ecuador vs Montenegro: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.