Ecuador vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Ecuador
1,274 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Georgia
1,265 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Ecuador rank
98th
Georgia rank
99th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Georgia
2505007501.0k1.2k199020052021

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 1,274 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,265 current US$ per square kilometre in Georgia, a difference of 9 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 98th and Georgia ranks 99th of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 285.23 current US$ per square kilometre 759.34 current US$ per square kilometre 474.11 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 518.79 current US$ per square kilometre 574.82 current US$ per square kilometre 56.03 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 1,194 current US$ per square kilometre 1,100 current US$ per square kilometre 93.82 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 1,256 current US$ per square kilometre 1,210 current US$ per square kilometre 45.87 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Ecuador or Georgia?
Ecuador, at 1,274 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,265 current US$ per square kilometre in Georgia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Ecuador and Georgia?
9 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Georgia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Ecuador and Georgia rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Ecuador ranks 98th and Georgia ranks 99th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/georgia/">Ecuador vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.