Cyprus vs Eswatini: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Cyprus
2,689 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Eswatini
2,760 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Cyprus rank
57th
Eswatini rank
54th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Cyprus
  • Eswatini
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k199020052021

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 2,760 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,689 current US$ per square kilometre in Cyprus, a difference of 71 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.

Cyprus ranks 57th and Eswatini ranks 54th of 178 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 1,322 current US$ per square kilometre 2,242 current US$ per square kilometre 919.98 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 2,294 current US$ per square kilometre 2,833 current US$ per square kilometre 539.19 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 2,457 current US$ per square kilometre 3,534 current US$ per square kilometre 1,077 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 2,543 current US$ per square kilometre 2,641 current US$ per square kilometre 98.4 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Cyprus or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 2,760 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,689 current US$ per square kilometre in Cyprus as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Cyprus and Eswatini?
71 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Eswatini?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Cyprus and Eswatini rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Cyprus ranks 57th and Eswatini ranks 54th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Eswatini: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/eswatini/">Cyprus vs Eswatini: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.