Croatia vs Ecuador: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Croatia
1,249 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Ecuador
1,274 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Croatia rank
101st
Ecuador rank
98th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Croatia
  • Ecuador
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199020052021

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 1,274 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,249 current US$ per square kilometre in Croatia, a difference of 25 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 101st and Ecuador ranks 98th of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Ecuador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 1,318 current US$ per square kilometre 303.4 current US$ per square kilometre 1,015 current US$ per square kilometre Croatia
2000s 1,799 current US$ per square kilometre 518.79 current US$ per square kilometre 1,280 current US$ per square kilometre Croatia
2010s 1,509 current US$ per square kilometre 1,194 current US$ per square kilometre 314.95 current US$ per square kilometre Croatia
2020s 1,224 current US$ per square kilometre 1,256 current US$ per square kilometre 32.27 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Croatia or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 1,274 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,249 current US$ per square kilometre in Croatia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Croatia and Ecuador?
25 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Ecuador?
27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
How do Croatia and Ecuador rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Croatia ranks 101st and Ecuador ranks 98th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Ecuador: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/croatia/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/croatia/ecuador/">Croatia vs Ecuador: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.