How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sudan?

10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Sudan: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Congo

351.87 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Sudan

345.19 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Congo rank

138th

Sudan rank

139th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

Congo
Sudan

How they compare

Congo currently reports 351.87 current US$ per square kilometre against 345.19 current US$ per square kilometre in Sudan, a difference of 6.68 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.

Congo ranks 138th and Sudan ranks 139th of 178 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Sudan	Difference	Ahead
2010s	418.23 current US$ per square kilometre	958.07 current US$ per square kilometre	539.84 current US$ per square kilometre	Sudan
2020s	320.4 current US$ per square kilometre	316.2 current US$ per square kilometre	4.2 current US$ per square kilometre	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Congo or Sudan?: Congo, at 351.87 current US$ per square kilometre against 345.19 current US$ per square kilometre in Sudan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Congo and Sudan?: 6.68 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sudan?: 10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
How do Congo and Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?: Congo ranks 138th and Sudan ranks 139th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Sudan: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/sudan/">Congo vs Sudan: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed: 04 October 2026

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.