How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Peru?

30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Peru: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Congo

351.87 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Peru

343.58 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Congo rank

138th

Peru rank

140th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

Congo
Peru

How they compare

Congo currently reports 351.87 current US$ per square kilometre against 343.58 current US$ per square kilometre in Peru, a difference of 8.29 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Peru ahead.

Congo ranks 138th and Peru ranks 140th of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Peru	Difference	Ahead
1990s	134.78 current US$ per square kilometre	237.26 current US$ per square kilometre	102.48 current US$ per square kilometre	Peru
2000s	254.39 current US$ per square kilometre	188.66 current US$ per square kilometre	65.73 current US$ per square kilometre	Congo
2010s	425.49 current US$ per square kilometre	341.12 current US$ per square kilometre	84.37 current US$ per square kilometre	Congo
2020s	320.4 current US$ per square kilometre	349.62 current US$ per square kilometre	29.21 current US$ per square kilometre	Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Congo or Peru?: Congo, at 351.87 current US$ per square kilometre against 343.58 current US$ per square kilometre in Peru as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Congo and Peru?: 8.29 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Peru?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Congo and Peru rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?: Congo ranks 138th and Peru ranks 140th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Peru: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/peru/">Congo vs Peru: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed: 04 October 2026

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.