Congo vs Nicaragua: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Congo
351.87 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Nicaragua
367.55 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Congo rank
138th
Nicaragua rank
136th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Congo
  • Nicaragua
100200300400500199020052021

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 367.55 current US$ per square kilometre against 351.87 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 15.68 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 138th and Nicaragua ranks 136th of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1990s 142.63 current US$ per square kilometre 300.67 current US$ per square kilometre 158.04 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 254.39 current US$ per square kilometre 328.77 current US$ per square kilometre 74.38 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 425.49 current US$ per square kilometre 371.51 current US$ per square kilometre 53.98 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 320.4 current US$ per square kilometre 367.27 current US$ per square kilometre 46.87 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Congo or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 367.55 current US$ per square kilometre against 351.87 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Congo and Nicaragua?
15.68 current US$ per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nicaragua?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Congo and Nicaragua rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Congo ranks 138th and Nicaragua ranks 136th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Nicaragua: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/nicaragua/">Congo vs Nicaragua: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.