China vs Rwanda: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

China
8,926 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Rwanda
8,958 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
China rank
24th
Rwanda rank
23rd

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • China
  • Rwanda
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199020052021

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 8,958 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,926 current US$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 32 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.

China ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 23rd of 178 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 762.82 current US$ per square kilometre 4,535 current US$ per square kilometre 3,772 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 1,636 current US$ per square kilometre 4,668 current US$ per square kilometre 3,032 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 5,475 current US$ per square kilometre 7,601 current US$ per square kilometre 2,126 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 8,306 current US$ per square kilometre 8,871 current US$ per square kilometre 565.16 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, China or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 8,958 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,926 current US$ per square kilometre in China as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between China and Rwanda?
32 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Rwanda?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do China and Rwanda rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
China ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 23rd of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Rwanda: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/rwanda/">China vs Rwanda: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.