Chile vs Panama: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Chile
546.24 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Panama
634.25 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Chile rank
131st
Panama rank
129th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Chile
  • Panama
200400600199020052021

How they compare

Panama currently reports 634.25 current US$ per square kilometre against 546.24 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 88.01 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 131st and Panama ranks 129th of 178 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 159.18 current US$ per square kilometre 261.54 current US$ per square kilometre 102.36 current US$ per square kilometre Panama
2000s 223.17 current US$ per square kilometre 340.35 current US$ per square kilometre 117.18 current US$ per square kilometre Panama
2010s 449.96 current US$ per square kilometre 612.61 current US$ per square kilometre 162.65 current US$ per square kilometre Panama
2020s 506.72 current US$ per square kilometre 633.15 current US$ per square kilometre 126.43 current US$ per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Chile or Panama?
Panama, at 634.25 current US$ per square kilometre against 546.24 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Chile and Panama?
88.01 current US$ per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Panama?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Chile and Panama rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Chile ranks 131st and Panama ranks 129th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Panama: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/panama/">Chile vs Panama: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.