How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eritrea?

19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Eritrea: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Chile

546.24 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Eritrea

435.78 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2011

Chile rank

131st

Eritrea rank

134th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

Chile
Eritrea

How they compare

Chile currently reports 546.24 current US$ per square kilometre against 435.78 current US$ per square kilometre in Eritrea, a difference of 110.46 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Eritrea's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 131st and Eritrea ranks 134th of 178 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Eritrea	Difference	Ahead
1990s	173.44 current US$ per square kilometre	209.97 current US$ per square kilometre	36.54 current US$ per square kilometre	Eritrea
2000s	223.17 current US$ per square kilometre	306.7 current US$ per square kilometre	83.53 current US$ per square kilometre	Eritrea
2010s	402.86 current US$ per square kilometre	405.34 current US$ per square kilometre	2.49 current US$ per square kilometre	Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Chile or Eritrea?: Chile, at 546.24 current US$ per square kilometre against 435.78 current US$ per square kilometre in Eritrea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Chile and Eritrea?: 110.46 current US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eritrea?: 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
How do Chile and Eritrea rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?: Chile ranks 131st and Eritrea ranks 134th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Eritrea: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/eritrea/">Chile vs Eritrea: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed: 04 October 2026

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.