Central African Republic vs Iceland: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Central African Republic
39.2 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Iceland
38.67 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Central African Republic rank
176th
Iceland rank
178th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Iceland
0204060199020052021

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 39.2 current US$ per square kilometre against 38.67 current US$ per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.53 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 176th and Iceland ranks 178th of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 3 and Iceland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 37.04 current US$ per square kilometre 34.36 current US$ per square kilometre 2.68 current US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic
2000s 32.09 current US$ per square kilometre 35.61 current US$ per square kilometre 3.52 current US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 37.24 current US$ per square kilometre 31.44 current US$ per square kilometre 5.8 current US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 38.05 current US$ per square kilometre 36.21 current US$ per square kilometre 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Central African Republic or Iceland?
Central African Republic, at 39.2 current US$ per square kilometre against 38.67 current US$ per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Central African Republic and Iceland?
0.53 current US$ per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Iceland?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Central African Republic and Iceland rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Central African Republic ranks 176th and Iceland ranks 178th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Iceland: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/iceland/">Central African Republic vs Iceland: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.