Canada vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Canada
69.17 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Namibia
108.72 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Canada rank
173rd
Namibia rank
171st

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Canada
  • Namibia
50100150199020052021

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 108.72 current US$ per square kilometre against 69.17 current US$ per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 39.55 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.6 times Canada's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 173rd and Namibia ranks 171st of 178 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 48.92 current US$ per square kilometre 95.69 current US$ per square kilometre 46.77 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 57.03 current US$ per square kilometre 111.22 current US$ per square kilometre 54.19 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 66.19 current US$ per square kilometre 139.58 current US$ per square kilometre 73.39 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 65.08 current US$ per square kilometre 106.42 current US$ per square kilometre 41.34 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Canada or Namibia?
Namibia, at 108.72 current US$ per square kilometre against 69.17 current US$ per square kilometre in Canada as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Canada and Namibia?
39.55 current US$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Namibia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Canada and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Canada ranks 173rd and Namibia ranks 171st of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/canada/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/canada/namibia/">Canada vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.