Cameroon vs Ecuador: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Cameroon
1,279 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Ecuador
1,274 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Cameroon rank
97th
Ecuador rank
98th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Cameroon
  • Ecuador
2505007501.0k1.2k199020052021

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 1,279 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,274 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 5 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 97th and Ecuador ranks 98th of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 552.12 current US$ per square kilometre 275.93 current US$ per square kilometre 276.19 current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2000s 714.16 current US$ per square kilometre 518.79 current US$ per square kilometre 195.37 current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2010s 1,131 current US$ per square kilometre 1,194 current US$ per square kilometre 62.5 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 1,237 current US$ per square kilometre 1,256 current US$ per square kilometre 18.92 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Cameroon or Ecuador?
Cameroon, at 1,279 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,274 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Cameroon and Ecuador?
5 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Ecuador?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Cameroon and Ecuador rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Cameroon ranks 97th and Ecuador ranks 98th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Ecuador: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/ecuador/">Cameroon vs Ecuador: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.