Cape Verde vs Malaysia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Cape Verde
2,084 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Malaysia
1,955 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Cape Verde rank
67th
Malaysia rank
70th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Malaysia
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199020052021

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 2,084 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,955 current US$ per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 129 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.

Cape Verde ranks 67th and Malaysia ranks 70th of 178 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Malaysia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,754 current US$ per square kilometre 464.21 current US$ per square kilometre 1,289 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 1,961 current US$ per square kilometre 728.29 current US$ per square kilometre 1,232 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 2,198 current US$ per square kilometre 1,552 current US$ per square kilometre 645.78 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 2,026 current US$ per square kilometre 1,856 current US$ per square kilometre 170.48 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Cape Verde or Malaysia?
Cape Verde, at 2,084 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,955 current US$ per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Cape Verde and Malaysia?
129 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Malaysia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Cape Verde and Malaysia rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Cape Verde ranks 67th and Malaysia ranks 70th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Malaysia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/malaysia/">Cape Verde vs Malaysia: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.