Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Cape Verde
2,084 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea
2,144 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Cape Verde rank
67th
Equatorial Guinea rank
65th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Equatorial Guinea
02.0k4.0k6.0k199020052021

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 2,144 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,084 current US$ per square kilometre in Cape Verde, a difference of 60 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 67th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 65th of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 1,754 current US$ per square kilometre 176.7 current US$ per square kilometre 1,577 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 1,961 current US$ per square kilometre 2,480 current US$ per square kilometre 519.79 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 2,198 current US$ per square kilometre 4,129 current US$ per square kilometre 1,931 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 2,026 current US$ per square kilometre 2,024 current US$ per square kilometre 2.85 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Cape Verde or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 2,144 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,084 current US$ per square kilometre in Cape Verde as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
60 current US$ per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Cape Verde ranks 67th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 65th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/equatorial-guinea/">Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.