Bhutan vs Congo: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Bhutan
340.5 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Congo
351.87 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Bhutan rank
141st
Congo rank
138th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Bhutan
  • Congo
100200300400500199020052021

How they compare

Congo currently reports 351.87 current US$ per square kilometre against 340.5 current US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 11.37 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.

Bhutan ranks 141st and Congo ranks 138th of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 134.53 current US$ per square kilometre 142.63 current US$ per square kilometre 8.1 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 181.09 current US$ per square kilometre 254.39 current US$ per square kilometre 73.3 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 282.68 current US$ per square kilometre 425.49 current US$ per square kilometre 142.81 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 331.68 current US$ per square kilometre 320.4 current US$ per square kilometre 11.28 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Bhutan or Congo?
Congo, at 351.87 current US$ per square kilometre against 340.5 current US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Bhutan and Congo?
11.37 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Congo?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Bhutan and Congo rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Bhutan ranks 141st and Congo ranks 138th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Congo: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/congo-rep/">Bhutan vs Congo: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.