Belgium vs China: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Belgium
8,831 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
China
8,926 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Belgium rank
25th
China rank
24th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Belgium
  • China
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k199020052021

How they compare

China currently reports 8,926 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,831 current US$ per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 95 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 25th and China ranks 24th of 178 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium China Difference Ahead
2000s 9,023 current US$ per square kilometre 1,636 current US$ per square kilometre 7,387 current US$ per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 9,388 current US$ per square kilometre 5,475 current US$ per square kilometre 3,913 current US$ per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 8,597 current US$ per square kilometre 8,306 current US$ per square kilometre 291.16 current US$ per square kilometre Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Belgium or China?
China, at 8,926 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,831 current US$ per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Belgium and China?
95 current US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and China?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Belgium and China rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Belgium ranks 25th and China ranks 24th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs China: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belgium/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belgium/china/">Belgium vs China: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.