Argentina vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Argentina
247.37 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Democratic Republic of Congo
236.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Argentina rank
153rd
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
155th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Argentina
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
100200300199020052021

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 247.37 current US$ per square kilometre against 236.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 11.28 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 153rd and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 155th of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Democratic Republic of Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Democratic Republic of Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 192.11 current US$ per square kilometre 93.84 current US$ per square kilometre 98.27 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 103.02 current US$ per square kilometre 128.42 current US$ per square kilometre 25.41 current US$ per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s 250.91 current US$ per square kilometre 209.27 current US$ per square kilometre 41.64 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 233.39 current US$ per square kilometre 230.94 current US$ per square kilometre 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Argentina or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Argentina, at 247.37 current US$ per square kilometre against 236.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Argentina and Democratic Republic of Congo?
11.28 current US$ per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Democratic Republic of Congo?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Argentina and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Argentina ranks 153rd and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 155th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/congo-dem-rep/">Argentina vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.