Afghanistan vs Panama: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Afghanistan
666.92 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Panama
634.25 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Afghanistan rank
128th
Panama rank
129th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Panama
200400600800199020052021

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 666.92 current US$ per square kilometre against 634.25 current US$ per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 32.67 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 128th and Panama ranks 129th of 178 countries.

Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Panama Difference Ahead
2000s 489.62 current US$ per square kilometre 354.86 current US$ per square kilometre 134.76 current US$ per square kilometre Afghanistan
2010s 760.56 current US$ per square kilometre 612.61 current US$ per square kilometre 147.95 current US$ per square kilometre Afghanistan
2020s 666.92 current US$ per square kilometre 632.05 current US$ per square kilometre 34.88 current US$ per square kilometre Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Afghanistan or Panama?
Afghanistan, at 666.92 current US$ per square kilometre against 634.25 current US$ per square kilometre in Panama as of 2020.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Afghanistan and Panama?
32.67 current US$ per square kilometre, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Panama?
19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
How do Afghanistan and Panama rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Afghanistan ranks 128th and Panama ranks 129th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Panama: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/panama/">Afghanistan vs Panama: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.