Belarus vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital
Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital over time
- Belarus
- Sweden
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 16.9% against 16.9% in Sweden, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 52nd and Sweden ranks 53rd of 204 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.3% | 14.4% | 0.0% | Sweden |
| 2000s | 13.7% | 15.8% | 2.1% | Sweden |
| 2010s | 15.1% | 16.5% | 1.4% | Sweden |
| 2020s | 16.8% | 16.9% | 0.1% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital, Belarus or Sweden?
- Belarus, at 16.9% against 16.9% in Sweden as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital between Belarus and Sweden?
- 0.0%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sweden?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do Belarus and Sweden rank globally for adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital?
- Belarus ranks 52nd and Sweden ranks 53rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Consumption of fixed capital represents the replacement value of capital used up in the process of production. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.