South Sudan vs Spain: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time
- South Sudan
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 0.7% against 0.7% in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 171st and Spain ranks 169th of 204 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, South Sudan or Spain?
- Spain, at 0.7% against 0.7% in South Sudan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between South Sudan and Spain?
- 0.0%, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Spain?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do South Sudan and Spain rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
- South Sudan ranks 171st and Spain ranks 169th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.