Sierra Leone vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Sierra Leone
1.0%
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands
1.0%
in 2021
Sierra Leone rank
142nd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
140th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Sierra Leone
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.250.50.751199020052021

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Sierra Leone ranks 142nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 140th of 204 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sierra Leone Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2010s 0.9% 0.8% 0.1% Sierra Leone
2020s 1.0% 1.0% 0.0% Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Sierra Leone or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 1.0% against 1.0% in Sierra Leone as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Sierra Leone and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0%, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Turks and Caicos Islands?
8 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
How do Sierra Leone and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Sierra Leone ranks 142nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 140th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sierra Leone vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/sierra-leone/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/sierra-leone/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Sierra Leone vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
251 places, 7,590 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.