Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan vs Turkmenistan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
3.4%
in 2020
Turkmenistan
6.8%
in 2019
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan rank
3rd
Turkmenistan rank
6th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
  • Turkmenistan
0102030199020052020

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 6.8% against 3.4% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, a difference of 3.4%.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 2.0 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 3rd and Turkmenistan ranks 6th of 47 groups.

Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 2.5% 19.9% 17.4% Turkmenistan
2000s 2.5% 15.8% 13.3% Turkmenistan
2010s 2.4% 7.1% 4.7% Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 6.8% against 3.4% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan as of 2019.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan and Turkmenistan?
3.4%, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan and Turkmenistan?
27 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2019.
How do Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan and Turkmenistan rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 3rd and Turkmenistan ranks 6th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan vs Turkmenistan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan/turkmenistan/">Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan vs Turkmenistan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
251 places, 7,590 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.