Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan vs Syria: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
3.4%
in 2020
Syria
9.9%
in 2020
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan rank
3rd
Syria rank
1st

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
  • Syria
0246810199020052020

How they compare

Syria currently reports 9.9% against 3.4% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, a difference of 6.5%.

That makes Syria's figure about 2.9 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ahead.

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 3rd and Syria ranks 1st of 47 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan averaged higher in 1 and Syria in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan Syria Difference Ahead
2000s 2.5% 1.0% 1.5% Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
2010s 2.4% 4.7% 2.2% Syria
2020s 3.4% 9.9% 6.5% Syria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan or Syria?
Syria, at 9.9% against 3.4% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan as of 2020.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan and Syria?
6.5%, with Syria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan and Syria?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan and Syria rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 3rd and Syria ranks 1st of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan vs Syria: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan/syrian-arab-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan/syrian-arab-republic/">Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan vs Syria: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
251 places, 7,590 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.