Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Mauritius
1.4%
in 2021
Sao Tome and Principe
1.3%
in 2021
Mauritius rank
99th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
102nd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Mauritius
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.511.5199020052021

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 1.4% against 1.3% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.1%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Mauritius ranks 99th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 102nd of 204 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 1.0% 1.4% 0.3% Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 1.1% 1.4% 0.3% Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 1.3% 1.4% 0.0% Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Mauritius or Sao Tome and Principe?
Mauritius, at 1.4% against 1.3% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.1%, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
How do Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Mauritius ranks 99th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 102nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/mauritius/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/mauritius/sao-tome-and-principe/">Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
251 places, 7,590 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.