Latvia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time
- Latvia
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.9% against 0.8% in Latvia, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 160th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 157th of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.1% | 0.6% | 1.5% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 1.2% | 0.6% | 0.6% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.1% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.8% | 0.9% | 0.0% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Latvia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.9% against 0.8% in Latvia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Latvia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.1%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Latvia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
- Latvia ranks 160th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 157th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.