Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) vs Marshall Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
1.4%
in 2021
Marshall Islands
2.8%
in 2021
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank
34th
Marshall Islands rank
35th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
  • Marshall Islands
11.522.53199020052021

How they compare

Marshall Islands currently reports 2.8% against 1.4% in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), a difference of 1.4%.

That makes Marshall Islands's figure about 2.0 times Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Marshall Islands ahead.

Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 34th and Marshall Islands ranks 35th of 47 groups.

Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9% 1.1% 0.2% Marshall Islands
2000s 1.2% 1.7% 0.5% Marshall Islands
2010s 1.0% 2.3% 1.2% Marshall Islands
2020s 1.4% 2.7% 1.3% Marshall Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) or Marshall Islands?
Marshall Islands, at 2.8% against 1.4% in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) and Marshall Islands?
1.4%, with Marshall Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) and Marshall Islands?
27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
How do Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) and Marshall Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 34th and Marshall Islands ranks 35th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) vs Marshall Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/latin-america-and-caribbean-excluding-high-income/marshall-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/latin-america-and-caribbean-excluding-high-income/marshall-islands/">Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) vs Marshall Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
251 places, 7,590 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.