Ethiopia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Ethiopia
0.9%
in 2021
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.9%
in 2021
Ethiopia rank
155th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
157th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0.250.50.7511.2199020052021

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 0.9% against 0.9% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 155th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 157th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5% 0.6% 0.1% Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 0.9% 0.6% 0.3% Ethiopia
2010s 0.7% 0.8% 0.1% Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.8% 0.9% 0.0% Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Ethiopia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Ethiopia, at 0.9% against 0.9% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Ethiopia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0%, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Ethiopia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Ethiopia ranks 155th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 157th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/ethiopia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/ethiopia/tanzania/">Ethiopia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
251 places, 7,590 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.