Eswatini vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Eswatini
1.1%
in 2021
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1.0%
in 2021
Eswatini rank
134th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
137th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Eswatini
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.511.522.5199020052021

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 1.1% against 1.0% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.1%.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Eswatini ranks 134th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 137th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1990s 0.6% 0.8% 0.2% Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.6% 1.2% 0.6% Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.7% 1.0% 0.3% Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 1.1% 1.0% 0.1% Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Eswatini or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Eswatini, at 1.1% against 1.0% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Eswatini and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.1%, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Eswatini and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Eswatini ranks 134th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 137th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/eswatini/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/eswatini/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Eswatini vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
251 places, 7,590 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.