Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Eritrea or Uganda?

Eritrea, at 0.8% against 0.8% in Uganda as of 2011.

How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Uganda?

20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.

Where does this data come from?

Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eritrea vs Uganda: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Eritrea

0.8%

in 2011

Uganda

0.8%

in 2021

Eritrea rank

158th

Uganda rank

159th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

Eritrea
Uganda

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 0.8% against 0.8% in Uganda, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 158th and Uganda ranks 159th of 204 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eritrea	Uganda	Difference	Ahead
1990s	1.8%	0.3%	1.5%	Eritrea
2000s	1.3%	0.5%	0.8%	Eritrea
2010s	0.9%	0.4%	0.5%	Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Eritrea or Uganda?: Eritrea, at 0.8% against 0.8% in Uganda as of 2011.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Eritrea and Uganda?: 0.0%, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Uganda?: 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
How do Eritrea and Uganda rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?: Eritrea ranks 158th and Uganda ranks 159th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Uganda: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/eritrea/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/eritrea/uganda/">Eritrea vs Uganda: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI)
Unit: % of GNI
Source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 251 places, 7,590 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.