Cuba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time
- Cuba
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Cuba, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 141st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 140th of 204 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Cuba or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 1.0% against 1.0% in Cuba as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Cuba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0.0%, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cuba and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
- Cuba ranks 141st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 140th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.