Cuba vs Kenya: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time
- Cuba
- Kenya
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Kenya, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 141st and Kenya ranks 144th of 204 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.5% | 1.1% | 0.5% | Cuba |
| 2000s | 1.5% | 1.0% | 0.5% | Cuba |
| 2010s | 1.2% | 0.9% | 0.3% | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Cuba or Kenya?
- Cuba, at 1.0% against 1.0% in Kenya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Cuba and Kenya?
- 0.0%, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Kenya?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Cuba and Kenya rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
- Cuba ranks 141st and Kenya ranks 144th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.