Central Europe and the Baltics vs Egypt: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time
- Central Europe and the Baltics
- Egypt
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 3.0% against 1.5% in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Egypt's figure about 2.0 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 29th and Egypt ranks 30th of 47 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 1 and Egypt in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Europe and the Baltics | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.8% | 2.4% | 1.4% | Central Europe and the Baltics |
| 2000s | 2.2% | 3.3% | 1.1% | Egypt |
| 2010s | 1.6% | 2.9% | 1.3% | Egypt |
| 2020s | 1.5% | 3.0% | 1.5% | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Central Europe and the Baltics or Egypt?
- Egypt, at 3.0% against 1.5% in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Central Europe and the Baltics and Egypt?
- 1.5%, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Egypt?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
- How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Egypt rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 29th and Egypt ranks 30th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.