Belgium vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time
- Belgium
- South Sudan
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0.7% against 0.7% in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 170th and South Sudan ranks 171st of 204 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Belgium or South Sudan?
- Belgium, at 0.7% against 0.7% in South Sudan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Belgium and South Sudan?
- 0.0%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do Belgium and South Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
- Belgium ranks 170th and South Sudan ranks 171st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.