Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Belarus or Palau?

Palau, at 4.1% against 3.9% in Belarus as of 2021.

How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Palau?

22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Palau: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Belarus

3.9%

in 2021

Palau

4.1%

in 2021

Belarus rank

23rd

Palau rank

21st

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

Belarus
Palau

How they compare

Palau currently reports 4.1% against 3.9% in Belarus, a difference of 0.2%.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 23rd and Palau ranks 21st of 204 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Palau	Difference	Ahead
2000s	5.2%	2.7%	2.5%	Belarus
2010s	3.4%	3.0%	0.4%	Belarus
2020s	4.0%	3.9%	0.1%	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Belarus or Palau?: Palau, at 4.1% against 3.9% in Belarus as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Belarus and Palau?: 0.2%, with Palau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Palau?: 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Belarus and Palau rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?: Belarus ranks 23rd and Palau ranks 21st of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Palau: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/belarus/palau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/belarus/palau/">Belarus vs Palau: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI)
Unit: % of GNI
Source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 251 places, 7,590 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.