Belarus vs IDA blend: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Belarus
3.9%
in 2021
IDA blend
1.9%
in 2021
Belarus rank
23rd
IDA blend rank
22nd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Belarus
  • IDA blend
2468199020052021

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 3.9% against 1.9% in IDA blend, a difference of 2.0%.

That makes Belarus's figure about 2.0 times IDA blend's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 23rd and IDA blend ranks 22nd of 204 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus IDA blend Difference Ahead
1990s 6.6% 2.7% 3.9% Belarus
2000s 5.2% 3.0% 2.3% Belarus
2010s 3.4% 1.6% 1.8% Belarus
2020s 4.0% 1.9% 2.1% Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Belarus or IDA blend?
Belarus, at 3.9% against 1.9% in IDA blend as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Belarus and IDA blend?
2.0%, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and IDA blend?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Belarus and IDA blend rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Belarus ranks 23rd and IDA blend ranks 22nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs IDA blend: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/belarus/ida-blend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/belarus/ida-blend/">Belarus vs IDA blend: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
251 places, 7,590 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.