Bahamas vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Bahamas
1.0%
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands
1.0%
in 2021
Bahamas rank
139th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
140th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Bahamas
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0.50.7511.21.51.8199020052021

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Bahamas ranks 139th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 140th of 204 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2010s 0.8% 0.8% 0.1% Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 1.0% 1.0% 0.0% Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Bahamas or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Bahamas, at 1.0% against 1.0% in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Bahamas and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0%, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Turks and Caicos Islands?
8 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
How do Bahamas and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Bahamas ranks 139th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 140th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/bahamas-the/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/bahamas-the/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Bahamas vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
251 places, 7,590 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.