Australia vs Eswatini: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Australia
1.1%
in 2021
Eswatini
1.1%
in 2021
Australia rank
133rd
Eswatini rank
134th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Australia
  • Eswatini
0.511.52199020052021

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1.1% against 1.1% in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 133rd and Eswatini ranks 134th of 204 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 1.3% 0.6% 0.7% Australia
2000s 1.4% 0.6% 0.8% Australia
2010s 1.0% 0.7% 0.3% Australia
2020s 1.2% 1.1% 0.0% Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Australia or Eswatini?
Australia, at 1.1% against 1.1% in Eswatini as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Australia and Eswatini?
0.0%, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Eswatini?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Australia and Eswatini rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Australia ranks 133rd and Eswatini ranks 134th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Eswatini: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/australia/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-percent-of-gni/australia/eswatini/">Australia vs Eswatini: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
251 places, 7,590 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.